<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.graphicstabletreviews.com/about/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.graphicstabletreviews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 11:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chaten</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicstabletreviews.com/about/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicstabletreviews.com/?page_id=2#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hello,

If possible a scoring system would be great for your site as well as categories of usage.  An interesting review would be on teh Aiptek models.  Poeple rave about them but an independent review would be good.

Interesting site:) It was exactly what i was looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>If possible a scoring system would be great for your site as well as categories of usage.  An interesting review would be on teh Aiptek models.  Poeple rave about them but an independent review would be good.</p>
<p>Interesting site:) It was exactly what i was looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

